Cutts Close, Playpark Oakham, Rutland, Upgrade Costs Soared Due to Councillors Oversight

Cutts Close, Playpark Oakham, Rutland, Upgrade Costs Soared Due to Councillors Oversight.

The recent refurbishment of the play area in Cutts Close, Oakham, has turned into a costly affair for Oakham town council, with the final bill exceeding initial estimates by several thousand pounds. This latest incident highlights a recurring pattern of financial mismanagement by the local authority, raising concerns about their stewardship of taxpayer funds.

The play area, which had been the subject of complaints from families regarding the deteriorating flooring, underwent a much-needed resurfacing last month. However, a revelation at the Oakham Town Council meeting on Wednesday, October 9, revealed that the project had cost significantly more than anticipated.

Instead of the £21,000 budgeted for the work, the final bill from contractor Playscape Playgrounds came in at £32,000. The discrepancy arose due to a simple oversight: the council had failed to notice that the "rainbow green" colour they had chosen for the new flooring was more expensive than the standard black option.

This error, while seemingly minor, has resulted in a substantial increase in costs for the project. The council has now approved the additional expenditure, despite the financial implications.

This incident is not an isolated case. In the past, Oakham Town Council has been criticised for its lack of attention to detail and its disregard for taxpayer money. 

One very recent example, the recent application for a grant by Victoria Hall was only partially successful due to the halls failure to provide the necessary documents and accounts.

A Oakham Town Councillor, said "we were stuck between a rock and stone, if we awarded the full grant requested we would have been criticised. If we had refuse the grant and the hall closed the residents would have seen us as the bad guys" 

Editors Comment:

The town council's repeated mistakes have raised serious concerns about its competence and ability to manage public funds responsibly. It's essential that the council takes immediate steps to improve its financial oversight and ensure that taxpayer money is used efficiently and effectively.

It's become increasingly evident that some council members are failing to read and understand the meeting documents they are provided. This negligence has led to numerous instances where contracts have been approved without proper review.

Such carelessness is a serious breach of trust and undermines the council's ability to make informed decisions. It's imperative that all council members take their responsibilities seriously and ensure that they are fully informed before casting their votes. 

One council member's justification for approving part of the Victoria Hall grant, despite the missing documentation, is deeply troubling. While it's understandable to want to avoid negative publicity, compromising financial integrity for the sake of public perception is a dangerous precedent.

The council must prioritise transparency, accountability, and the responsible use of public funds. It's time for a thorough review of financial procedures and a commitment to preventing similar mistakes in the future.

The days of Oakham town council approving contracts without proper review are thankfully behind us, hopefully. However, the excuse that council members are volunteers and don't have time is unacceptable.

While volunteering is commendable, it's crucial that those who take on these roles are committed to fulfilling their responsibilities diligently. If the demands of the position are too much, it's perhaps time to reconsider one's involvement.

The stewardship of public funds is a serious matter that requires careful attention. Council members must prioritise their public duties and ensure that they have the time and resources necessary to make informed decisions.

I find myself commending the chairman of Oakham Town Council for his decision to overturn the request for this matter to be an exempt item. His commitment to transparency is a positive step forward at long last.

It's concerning that there was even a suggestion to treat this issue as an exempt item. Such attempts to conceal information from the public are unacceptable and erode trust in the council.

I hope that this incident serves as a reminder of the importance of open and accountable governance. By keeping the public informed, the council can foster greater trust and confidence in its decision-making processes.